Catholicity

ESCHATOLOGY

They all therefore praised the ways of the Lord, the just judge who brings to light the things that are hidden. Turning to supplication, they prayed that the sinful deed might be fully blotted out. The noble Judas warned the soldiers to keep themselves free from sin, for they had seen with their own eyes what had happened because of the sin of those who had fallen. He then took up a collection among all his soldiers, amounting to two thousand silver drachmas, which he sent to Jerusalem to provide for an expiatory sacrifice. In doing this he acted in a very excellent and noble way, inasmuch as he had the resurrection of the dead in view; for if he were not expecting the fallen to rise again, it would have been useless and foolish to pray for them in death. But if he did this with a view to the splendid reward that awaits those who had gone to rest in godliness, it was a holy and pious thought.
Second Book of Maccabees 12, 41-45

When everything is subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected
to the one who subjected everything to him so that God may be all in all.
Otherwise, what will people accomplish by having themselves baptized for the
dead? If the dead are not raised at all, then why are they having themselves
baptized for them?
1 Corinthians 15, 28-29

According to the commission of God given to me, like a skilled master builder, I laid a foundation, and another man is building upon it. Let each man take care of how he builds upon it. For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble— each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work which any man has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.
1 Corinthians 3, 10-15

My Explications of the Patristic Texts

Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 202)
Stromata, 6:14

“Accordingly the believer, through great discipline, divesting himself of the passions,
passes to the mansion which is better than the former one, viz., to the greatest
torment, taking with him the characteristic of repentance from the sins he has
committed after baptism. He is tortured then still more–not yet or not quite
attaining what he sees others to have acquired. Besides, he is also ashamed of his
transgressions. The greatest torments, indeed, are assigned to the believer. For
God’s righteousness is good, and His goodness is righteous. And though the
punishments cease in the course of the completion of the expiation and of each
one, yet those have very great and grief who are found worthy of the other fold, on
account of not being along with those that have been glorified through righteousness.”

The text explores the complex journey of a believer who strives for spiritual growth through discipline and the renunciation of worldly desires. This journey reflects a transformation from a former state of being, but it leads to a paradoxical experience of suffering.

At the outset, St. Clement highlights that achieving a higher state of spiritual awareness requires significant effort and self-control. By divesting oneself of passions, the believer aims to elevate his spiritual condition. However, this transition is not inherently joyful; instead, it comes with the burden of reflection on past mistakes.

After baptism, which symbolizes a sort of spiritual rebirth or cleansing, there is a deep awareness of one’s sins. The author suggests that instead of liberation, this awareness can lead to a state of torment because the believer feels remorse for their transgressions. This ongoing sense of guilt and shame becomes a source of profound suffering as they compare themselves to the righteousness achieved by others.

The most intense suffering is reserved for the believer, as they are acutely aware that divine justice demands accountability. God’s goodness and righteousness serve as a backdrop that intensifies their feeling of inadequacy and grief. Clement portrays this state as a form of purging suffering, which, although aimed at eventual redemption, initially fosters a sense of despair.

The mention of expiation suggests a process of atonement for sins, indicating that while the suffering may eventually cease after one has made amends, the emotional weight of not being part of a glorified or redeemed community lingers. For those who are ultimately deemed worthy to enter a ‘better realm,’ there remains an acute sense of loss related to their previous state and the glory attained by others.

Overall, the text conveys the nuanced relationship between discipline, repentance, and spiritual progress, highlighting the intense emotional struggles that accompany the journey toward righteousness. It underlines themes of guilt, longing, and the moral weight of one’s past actions in the pursuit of a closer relationship with the divine.

Tertullian (A.D. 210)
A Treatise on the Soul, 35

“That allegory of the Lord which is extremely clear and simple in its meaning, and
ought to be from the first understood in its plain and natural sense…Then,
again, should you be disposed to apply the term ‘adversary’ to the devil, you are
advised by the (Lord’s) injunction, while you are in the way with him, ‘to make even
with him such a compact as may be deemed compatible with the requirements of your
true faith. Now, the compact you have made respecting him is to renounce him and his
pomp, and his angels. Such is your agreement in this matter. Now the friendly
understanding you will have to carry out must arise from your observance of the
compact: you must never think of getting back any of the things that you have
abjured, and have restored to him, lest he should summon you as a fraudulent man,
and a transgressor of your agreement before God the Judge (for in this light do we
read of him, in another passage, as ‘the accuser of the brethren,’ or saints, where
reference is made to the actual practice of legal prosecution); and lest this Judge
deliver you over to the angel who is to execute the sentence, and he commits you to the
prison of hell, out of which there will be no dismissal until the smallest even of your
delinquencies be paid off in the period before the resurrection. What can be a more
fitting sense than this? What a truer interpretation?”

The text presents an allegorical interpretation of a spiritual struggle with the devil, depicting him as an adversary whose influence must be recognized and renounced.

Tertullian asserts that the message conveyed about the Lord should be understood in a straightforward manner. It’s not meant to be convoluted or open to extensive interpretation but rather clear and direct. The text refers to the devil as an “adversary,” highlighting the ongoing conflict between good and evil. This suggests that individuals must be conscious of the temptations and challenges the devil represents. It advises making a “reasonable agreement” with the devil while acknowledging his presence. This agreement entails a commitment to renounce the devil, which symbolizes a rejection of sin and temptation.

The commitment to renounce the devil is described as crucial. Violating this commitment—by trying to reclaim what has been renounced—would lead to accusations of deceit and a breach of one’s covenant with God. The devil is depicted as “the accuser of the brethren,” suggesting that he functions as a prosecutor who seeks to bring forth the faults of individuals. This role emphasizes the importance of individuals being vigilant about their actions to avoid condemnation.

If one fails to uphold the agreement with God and disregards the warnings, the text warns of dire consequences, including being handed over to an angel enforcing divine judgment. This alludes to the theological belief in divine justice and the existence of purgatory as a place of punishment. The idea that one remains imprisoned in purgatory until their transgressions are fully accounted for implies a process of judgment and emphasizes the significance of repentance. The notion of resurrection brings a promise of hope for redemption in the future.

Overall, the text serves as a cautionary reminder of the importance of spiritual integrity, the need for conscious choices in one’s faith journey, and the grave consequences of failing to uphold one’s commitments to God. The interpretation encourages a sincere understanding of one’s actions and their alignment with spiritual beliefs.

Cyprian of Carthage (A.D. 253)
To Antonianus, Epistle 51 (55):20

“For to adulterers, even a time of repentance is granted by us, and peace is given. Yet
virginity is not, therefore, deficient in the Church, nor does the glorious design of
continence languish through the sins of others. The Church, crowned with so many
virgins, flourishes, and chastity and modesty preserve the tenor of their glory. Nor is
the vigor of continence broken down because repentance and pardon are facilitated
to the adulterer. It is one thing to stand for pardon, another thing to attain to glory: it
is one thing, when cast into prison, not to go out thence until one has paid the
uttermost farthing; another thing at once to receive the wages of faith and courage. It
is one thing, tortured by long suffering for sins, to be cleansed and long purged by
fire; another to have purged all sins by suffering. It is one thing, in fine, to be in
suspense till the sentence of God at the day of judgment; another to be at once
crowned by the Lord.”

The text addresses the themes of sin, repentance, and the value of chastity within the Church. It begins by acknowledging that even those who commit adultery are given the opportunity to repent and find peace, highlighting the Church’s capacity for forgiveness. However, the author emphasizes that the presence of sin does not diminish the virtue of virginity or the significance of chastity in the Church.

The Church is portrayed as being rich in virtuous members, particularly those who live a life of chastity and modesty, which are celebrated as integral to the Church’s glory. St. Cyprian contrasts the ideas of seeking forgiveness and achieving true honor or glory. He points out that while forgiveness allows for a fresh start, it doesn’t necessarily equate to the highest spiritual rewards or virtues.

There is also a distinction made between enduring suffering and waiting for purification versus experiencing immediate redemption. The text suggests that those who live in accordance with the Church’s teachings and maintain their chastity are held in high regard, receiving immediate spiritual rewards from God, as opposed to those who must endure the consequences of their sins over time before achieving the same level of grace.

Overall, Cyprian upholds the importance of purity and virtue while recognizing the human tendency to sin and the Church’s role in offering forgiveness and guidance. He highlights a contrast between the paths of the penitent and the virtuous, suggesting that while both are important, the latter is ultimately more glorious in the eyes of God.

Lactantius (A.D. 307)
The Divine Institutes, 7:21

“The same divine fire, therefore, with one and the same force and power, will both burn the wicked and will form them again, and will replace as much as it shall consume of their bodies, and will supply itself with eternal nourishment: which the poets transferred to the vulture of Tityus. Thus, without any wasting of bodies, which regain their substance, it will only burn and affect them with a sense of pain. But when He shall have judged the righteous, He will also try them with fire. Then they whose sins shall exceed either in weight or in number shall be scorched by the fire and burnt: but they whom full justice and maturity of virtue have imbued will not perceive that fire; for they have something of God in themselves which repels and rejects the violence of the flame.”

The text presents a complex metaphorical view of divine judgment and purification through fire. It opens by suggesting that the same divine fire has dual roles: it punishes the wicked while also reshaping and transforming them. This indicates that judgment is not solely about punishment; there is an element of potential redemption or rebirth involved.

The comparison between the vulture and Tityus references classical mythology, where Tityus is punished for his crimes by being eternally consumed by a vulture. This imagery reinforces the idea of perpetual suffering for the wicked, highlighting both their punishment and the aspect of regeneration, as the fire can reshape and restore what it consumes rather than leading to total annihilation. The notion that this fire “gets its eternal energy from within” suggests that divine judgment is inherent and self-sustaining rather than dependent on external forces. It serves as a reminder that the power of judgment and purification is boundless and originates from a divine source.

Moreover, the text indicates that all individuals will face some form of trial or judgment through fire, implying that even the righteous will be tested. However, for the virtuous, this fire is benign; they are protected by a divine essence within them, allowing them to emerge unscathed and unharmed. This underscores a central theme: the inner moral and spiritual qualities one possesses act as a shield against judgment.

In conclusion, the passage illustrates a nuanced understanding of divine justice that encompasses both punishment and potential transformation. It emphasizes the belief that true virtue and justice hold protective power, while also acknowledging the reality of judgment for all, with the possibility of redemption for even the wicked.

Cyril of Jerusalem (A.D. 350)
Catechetical Lectures, 23:9,10

“Then we commemorate also those who have fallen asleep before us, first Patriarchs,
Prophets, Apostles, Martyrs that at their prayers and intercessions, God would
receive our petition. Then on behalf also of the Holy Fathers and Bishops who have
fallen asleep before us, and in a word of all who in past years have fallen asleep
among us, believing that it will be a very great benefit to the souls, for whom the
supplication is put up, while that holy and most awful sacrifice is set forth. And I wish
to persuade you with an illustration. For I know that many say, what is a soul profited,
which departs from this world either with sins or without sins if it is commemorated in
the prayer? For if a king were to banish certain who had given him offense, and then
those who belong to them should weave a crown and offer it to him on behalf of those
under punishment, would he not grant a remission of their penalties? In the same way,
we, when we offer to Him our supplications for those who have fallen asleep, though
they are sinners, weave no crown, but offer up Christ sacrificed for our sins,
propitiating our merciful God for them as well as for ourselves.”

The text reflects on the practice of commemorating those who have passed away, specifically focusing on religious figures such as Patriarchs, Prophets, Apostles, and Martyrs. It emphasizes the belief that these commemorations—essentially prayers and intercessions made on behalf of the deceased—serve a significant purpose, particularly in the context of the Christian faith.

St. Cyril highlights the importance of remembering not just prominent religious figures but also ordinary believers who have died. This act of remembrance is seen as a way to connect with the spiritual realm, asking for intercessions that might aid the souls in their journey after death. The author states that through these prayers, it is believed that God will receive the petitions made for the souls of the departed. This underscores the communal aspect of faith, where the living plays a role in assisting those who have passed, fostering a sense of unity within the faith community.

Cyril argues that supplicating for the departed souls has tangible benefits. It is posited that the act of praying for those who have died can positively influence their spiritual state, particularly during the presentation of the sacrificial offering. To explain the concept of spiritual intercession further, the author uses a metaphor involving a king. In this analogy, individuals who have offended the king might be granted leniency if their friends plead on their behalf with a symbolic offering (like a crown). Similarly, when believers present their prayers to God for deceased loved ones, they are not literally offering a crown; instead, they are presenting Christ and his sacrifice, which is believed to have the power to offer mercy and forgiveness.

The concluding thought emphasizes the intent behind these supplications—not just to benefit the departed souls but also to seek mercy for the living. The act of prayer is portrayed as a way to appeal to God’s compassion and love, reinforcing the dual focus on both the deceased and the living community of believers. In essence, the text serves to illustrate the theological and communal significance of remembering the dead through prayer, highlighting the belief in the interconnectedness of the spiritual journey across life and death.

Ephraim the Syrian (A.D. 373)
His Testament

“Lay me not with sweet spices: for this honor avails me not; Nor yet incense and perfumes: for the honor benefits me not. Burn sweet spices in the Holy Place: and me, even me, conduct to the grave with prayer. Give ye incense to God: and over me send up hymns. Instead of perfumes of spices: in prayer make remembrance of me.”

The text expresses a profound sentiment regarding the proper way to honor the deceased. It firmly states that traditional burial honors, such as sweet spices, incense, and perfumes, hold no real value for the person being mourned. Instead, the emphasis is on the spiritual act of remembrance through prayer.

St. Ephraim explicitly asks not to bestow typical burial honors like spices and perfumes, suggesting that these physical items are meaningless after death. This reflects a perspective that material luxuries do not serve the deceased’s needs or contribute to their peace. The author elevates the importance of spiritual practices. He advocates for prayer and remembrance as the true tribute to the departed. The idea is that invoking God’s presence and raising hymns in their memory holds greater significance than physical offerings.

By suggesting that incense should be offered to God rather than to the deceased, the speaker underscores the belief that honor should be directed toward the divine. This illustrates a view that one’s relationship with God is paramount over earthly rituals. The repeated call to “remember me in your prayers” implies that a person’s legacy lies in the memories they leave behind and the ongoing prayers of those they touched during their life. This conveys a belief in the enduring connection between the living and the deceased through spiritual remembrance.

Overall, the text advocates for a shift from materialistic practices to a focus on spiritual acts of remembrance, emphasizing that true honor comes from prayer and connection to a higher power rather than from superficial rituals.

Gregory of Nyssa (A.D. 394)
Sermon on the Dead, PG 13:445,448

“When he has quitted his body, and the difference between virtue and vice is known, he cannot approach God till the purging fire shall have cleansed the stains with which his soul was infested. That same fire in others will cancel the corruption of matter and the propensity to evil.”

The text explores themes of spirituality, accountability, and purification after death. It suggests that when a person moves beyond their physical existence (“leaves their body”), they gain a profound understanding of moral distinctions—specifically, the difference between virtue and vice. This newfound awareness comes with the realization of one’s actions and their consequences.

The mention of a “purging fire” symbolizes a transformative process that purifies the soul. This concept is often associated with the idea of judgment or cleansing in various religious and philosophical traditions, where the soul must be free from impurities or sins before approaching a divine entity, which in this case is God.

Furthermore, the fire is described as not only cleansing the individual’s soul but also as having a broader effect on the corruption of matter and the tendencies toward evil present in others. This indicates a universal aspect of purification; as one individual is cleansed, it can also influence the surrounding environment and perhaps serve to encourage or enforce the moral rectitude of others.

In essence, the text highlights the need for inner cleansing and moral rectitude before one can attain a higher spiritual state or a connection with the divine. It emphasizes the idea that personal transformation is necessary to transcend earthly flaws and promotes the notion of accountability for one’s actions.

Augustine of Hippo (A.D. 421)
Enchiridion, 69

“And it is not impossible that something of the same kind may take place even after this life. It is a matter that may be inquired into, and either ascertained or left doubtful, whether some believers shall pass through a kind of purgatorial fire, and in proportion as they have loved with more or less devotion the goods that perish, be less or more quickly delivered from it. This cannot, however, be the case of any of those of whom it is said that they ‘shall not inherit the kingdom of God’ unless, after suitable repentance, their sins be forgiven them. When I say ‘suitable,’ I mean that they are not to be unfruitful in almsgiving, for Holy Scripture lays so much stress on this virtue that our Lord tells us beforehand that He will ascribe no merit to those on His right hand but that they abound in it, and no defect to those on His left hand but their want of it, when He shall say to the former, “Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom,” and to the latter, ‘Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire.’”

St. Augustine presents a reflection on the themes of afterlife consequences, judgment, and the nature of repentance in relation to one’s deeds. He suggests that there might be a purgatorial state for some believers, where the intensity and duration of their suffering could correlate with their attachment to worldly goods. Those who have loved material possessions less might experience a quicker release from this suffering, indicating a form of cleansing before entering a heavenly state.

However, the author emphasizes that this concept does not apply to those who are described as not inheriting the kingdom of God unless they experience genuine forgiveness after true repentance. This “true repentance” involves a transformative change in one’s behavior, leading to acts of charity and goodness, which are highlighted as essential virtues in Holy Scripture.

The distinction between the outcomes for the righteous and the wicked is illustrated through the imagery of a judgment scene where Jesus distinguishes between those who have acted virtuously and those who have not. This allegorical separation is underscored by the phrases spoken by the Lord: He welcomes the righteous into the kingdom with blessings and admonishes the unrighteous to depart into eternal punishment.

In summary, the text grapples with the ideas of judgment, grace, and the necessity of good deeds as a reflection of genuine faith and repentance, positioning charity as a crucial element in the evaluative process of one’s afterlife standing.

Pope Gregory the Great (A.D. 594)
Dialogues, 4:39

“Each one will be presented to the Judge exactly as he was when he departed this life. Yet, there must be a cleansing fire before judgment because of some minor faults that may remain to be purged away. Does not Christ, the Truth, say that if anyone blasphemes against the Holy Spirit, he shall not be forgiven ‘either in this world or in the world to come'(Mt. 12:32)? From this statement, we learn that some sins can be forgiven in this world and some in the world to come. For, if forgiveness is refused for a particular sin, we conclude logically that it is granted to others. This must apply, as I said, to slight transgressions.”

The text presents a theological perspective on judgment and forgiveness as interpreted from Catholic beliefs. It outlines several key points regarding the state of individuals at the time of judgment and the nature of sins.

The opening assertion emphasizes that individuals will be judged by God in the same condition they were in at the moment of their death. This suggests a permanence to one’s spiritual state at the time of passing, which may have consequences for their judgment. The mention of a “cleansing fire” signifies a purifying process before the final judgment. This concept may align with ideas of purgatory or a similar state where souls undergo purification to rid themselves of minor faults or sins that would otherwise prevent them from entering a state of grace.

Pope Gregory references Matthew 12:32, highlighting that blaspheming against the Holy Spirit is an unforgivable act. This establishes a distinction between sins; some are deemed unpardonable, while others can be redeemed both in this life and afterward. The specific nature of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit remains a complex theological discussion, often understood as a total rejection of God’s grace. The principle laid out suggests a gradation in the forgiveness of sins, indicating that certain minor transgressions can be forgiven either during one’s life or after death. This implies a merciful aspect of divine judgment, allowing for the possibility of redemption and reconciliation with God.

His Holiness concludes with a logical deduction based on the nature of forgiveness. If some sins (like blasphemy against the Holy Spirit) cannot be forgiven, it follows that others must be forgivable. This creates a framework where individuals can understand their relationship with sin and forgiveness, allowing for hope in receiving mercy for lesser faults.

In summary, the text articulates a view on the conditionality of sin, the process of divine judgment, and the nature of forgiveness, balancing a sense of accountability with the promise of redemption.

And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him;
but whosoever shall speak against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him,
neither in this world, nor in that which is to come.
Matthew 12, 32

PAX VOBISCUM